Denial and the 2020 Election – David Stringer, Publisher

If national polls are to be believed,  a substantial majority of Republican voters don’t believe President Biden was legitimately elected and that the presidency was in some way “stolen”  from Donald Trump. As a Trump supporter,  I would like to believe that.  Unfortunately,  I can’t find the evidence.  And I’ve looked.

The Maricopa County audit  overseen by Republican officials ended up giving Biden several hundred more votes than  he got on election day. Reviews in other states overseen  by Republican governors and legislatures  have failed to turn up significant evidence of fraud.  As we enter the 2022 election year, it’s important to understand why Trump lost in 2020. We  can’t afford  to make the same mistakes  again.

In the summer of 2015, I was an Arizona delegate to the National Convention of the American Federation of Republican Assemblies (AFRA) in Nashville where I heard  Donald Trump speak for the first time.  It was a  command  performance—a forerunner  of what became his trademark  ‘rally’ speech. What Trump did that day was unlike any politician  I’ve ever heard.

He spoke for an hour, without notes, in a relaxed, natural, conversational style.  He struck chords of populism and nationalism.  He mocked the  media and the feckless Republican  establishment. He said  “out loud”  what no other presidential candidate had ever said before—America is in decline.  Our leaders have sold us out.  He touched on all the familiar themes—bad trade deals   outsourced jobs and manufacturing,  endless foreign wars,  third world  immigration,  an overreaching federal bureaucracy—and how they were destroying the prosperity and heritage of our country.  He  promised to put America  First and Make  America Great Again. He came across as  authentic. He was a truth teller.  It’s  been a rocky road  with Donald Trump, but my faith in his political mission has held strong.

A few months after my first encounter with Trump, I got a call from former State Senator Thayer Verschoor, who had also been a  delegate at the AFRA  convention and was now helping Team Trump prepare for the upcoming Arizona Republican primary.  He  asked  if I would help put  together a Trump for President committee in Yavapai County.  I was honored to be asked.

My first thought was to enlist the help of  longtime  Republican  activist, Brenda Dickinson– now a member of the  Prescott  Valley Town  Council.  Brenda and I put  together the names of  15  potential  Trump supporters  and  invited  them to an  organizational  meeting at my hotel,  the former Comfort Inn in  Prescott. I had just announced for the state legislature and was putting together my own campaign.  We unanimously selected Brenda  as our Chair.  She went on to build  the  most successful  Trump committee in Arizona. In our  March 22nd  Presidential  Primary,  Trump swept Yavapai  County and the state.

In 2016, for the fifth time in our nation’s history,  the  candidate for president who did not receive a  majority of the popular vote won the election.  The same thing happened 16 years earlier when George Bush defeated Al Gore.  Gore won the popular  vote. Bush won the Electoral College.

Losing the popular vote but winning the Electoral College has given Republicans a false sense of  security in national elections.  It allows us to ignore the awkward  fact that the majority of our countrymen voted for someone else.  As long as Republicans can cobble together enough votes to win the Electoral College,  we can pretend we are still in control.

A quick review of what happened in 2016 exposes our weakness.  Hillary Clinton got 51.1%  of the  popular vote to 48.9% for Donald Trump.  But Trump got 304 electoral college votes to Clinton’s  227—a difference of  77 votes.  These 77 electoral college votes came from just five states– Arizona, Georgia,  Michigan, Pennsylvania,  and Wisconsin—all states  that Trump won in  2016  but lost in 2020.  Drilling down a bit into the actual margins of victory,  Michigan’s 20 electoral votes went to Trump by 10,704 votes,  Pennsylvania’s by 44,,292,  Wisconsin’s by  22,747.  The margins in Georgia and  Arizona were bigger.  But Trump’s win in these five key states which secured his  victory rested on just 400,000  votes out of a  total  of 130  million votes cast—a margin of victory of less than .3%.  The popular vote went to Hilary Clinton by nearly three million votes.

A similar pattern emerges from the 2020 election.  Once again, the Democrat won the popular vote with Biden at  51.3% to Trump’s 46.8%—a spread of over 4 million votes. But this time Trump narrowly lost the five key states he won in 2016.   Let’s call the roll from the official canvas:  Arizona down 10,457, Georgia down 11,779, Michigan down 154,188,  Pennsylvania down 80,555, and Wisconsin down 20,682 votes.  Trump lost these five key states by less than 300,000 votes—an even smaller number than his margin of victory in 2016.

Why was Trump unable to build on his 2016 winning strategy in 2020?  He was well funded and had the advantage of incumbency.  Exit polls showed that he gained with every racial and ethnic voting  block–except the  one that counted most.  His  share of  the white vote declined  by six percentage  points  from 2016 to  2020.

I saw most of Trump’s 2020 rallies, six of which were in Arizona.  Within the first 20 minutes of every rally, Trump talked about the economy and what he had done for minorities,  e.g.. higher black employment numbers,  higher Hispanic  home ownership rates,  more minorities in college,  and so on.  And it was all true. America First policies were working  for everyone. But how  did this actually translate into votes?  As a group, blacks rewarded Trump with 12%  of their vote compared to 87% for Biden. For Hispanics the vote was  59% for Biden,  38% for Trump.  For Asians, who are now the most  highly educated and affluent demographic in America,  63% went for  Biden,  31% for Trump.

Although  Trump did get a   higher  percentage of minority votes in 2020 compared to 2016,  he came nowhere  near  winning a  majority of any minority group. For as  long as  we have  records, we know that race and ethnicity are the best predictors of how minorities vote.  They transcend  every other social and economic factor.  This is a hard truth for many  Republicans.

Here is an anecdote that explains the deep confusion and denial at the top levels of the Republican party.  In the aftermath of Mitt Romney’s 2012 loss to Barrack Obama,  Arizona  Republican  State Chair,  Robert Graham, came  to  Prescott to tell a meeting of the Republican Men’s Forum  about his outreach to minorities. He claimed that the Republican party was too white and we needed to be more inclusive.  He said that blacks, in  particular,  with their strong family values,  high rates of  church  attendance and  innate patriotism,  were  natural  conservatives and ripe for  conversion to the  Republican  Party.

At that  time,  blacks were less than 5% of  the state population and  overwhelmingly Democrat in  party registration.  Arizona’s white population was over 70 percent.  In percentage terms,  it would take many times the number of blacks to vote Republican to equal a 1% increase in the white Republican  vote.   So I asked Mr. Graham the obvious question,  “Sir, given that there are many more white voters  than black voters in  Arizona,  have  you ever considered  reaching out for the white  vote?”  There was an awkward silence as the blood drained from his face.  He stammered incomprehensibly.  It was  clear that for the Republican establishment,  it’s OK to talk  about recruiting minorities, but bad manners to talk about increasing the  white vote.

According to the 2020 US Census,  high levels of non white immigration and a low white birth  rate  has shrunk the white population to 57.8% of the total.  This  reflects a decline from 70.4% in 2000 and 80.3% as recently as 1990.  But because  non citizens are included in the US Census, the voting population remains  roughly 70%  white—enough to win elections in most states.

None of this is to suggest that the Republican party is a political  party for whites only. Since its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party,  the Republican party has welcomed blacks and people of all races.  A political party represents a set of ideas and values.  It is  not a racial grouping. Fundamental to the Republican philosophy of government is a belief in personal freedom,  limited government and equality before  the law.

There are black  Republicans today who can trace their family roots to the founding generation of Republicans.  But it would be naïve to think that race is not an issue in American politics.  Powerful forces in the media and academia are pushing virulent anti-white racism thru Critical Race Theory and the 1619 Project.  President Biden and many prominent Democrats have openly embraced these ideas.

Trump himself and his diehard supporters cling to the idea that the election was stolen. But  election irregularities were not widespread enough to explain Trump’s loss.  For  Trump’s supporters to say that the election was  stolen is simply mistaken.  Or  worse, it’s a form  of willful  blindness rooted in the denial of a truth too painful to accept.

I am writing about this because to deny reality is dangerous.  Success in politics is no different than any other kind of success.  It begins with clear thinking and a firm grasp on reality.  Voter fraud is a distraction.  It’s a form of denial.   Don’t look here, look over there.  For Republicans to cling to the myth of a stolen election  puts future elections at risk.

The evidence shows  that Trump lost because he didn’t get enough  votes.  He listened to the wrong people and watered  down his message.  This cost him white, working class voters in key  states.  Let’s not make that mistake  again.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest

10 thoughts on “Denial and the 2020 Election – David Stringer, Publisher”

  1. We know through forensic audits that millions of over votes were manufactured and through vote counting machines, votes were changed internally as well as by remote computers. “Packet capture” of the time stamped transmissions to foreign countries shows the amount of the reversed votes.
    Additionally, total votes cast and counted exceeded the total number of registered voters in America! We further know Silicone Valley pumped over 500,000.000 into “enhanced services” to key Democrat strongholds in the key states David mentions. Services that produced a variety of illegal vote captures and illegal duplications as well as complete deletion of th3 2020 election that are to kept for 22 months “after” the 2020 election.

    1. Suzanne Cook Catlin

      Hi Tom, I agree with you. I have closely followed the issues in the election since Nov. 30 special hearing. I sat for 10 hours memorized by the testimony. There wasn’t a doubt in that room by the end of the day that something terrible had happened. I’m a researcher and an investigative journalist by training and I’ve used those skills to do a deeper dive on the process and what happened, being careful to listen to all sides. My career was in organizational development, so I’m fairly good a discerning the breakdown in organizations from several standpoints. Having a master’s in public administration was also helpful and I’ve been teaching the Hillsdale’s Constitution and Public Policy for five years. What I had learned by early summer was compelling enough for me to make a decision to become more involved. But let’s pretend for a moment that our elections were fine (they weren’t). The bottomline question is this. Whose elections are they? Who do they belong to? I maintain that it’s We the People who own elections, not Us Your Government. I think it’s time our country get back to our founder’s vision. I hope others will join me in making this happen.

    2. How do we know that, Tom? What are our sources for this info?
      BTW, miss your comments in the Courier. Their loss, IMHO.

      1. George Hotchkiss

        Mr. Dean, I will make a prediction, there will be no valid sources for Mr. Steele’s claims. The Trump campaign had ample opportunity to file suit and provide evidence of fraud. they were not able to do that. There are plenty of folks who will bring up computer inconsistencies and other nebulous information that is grist for the Stop The Steal crowd, but the U.S. is a nation of laws, not men. If you can’t show evidence in court, then there is no evidence.

  2. Two primary categories of ineligible ballots and election mishandling, encompassing hundreds
    of thousands of votes, render the 2020 General Election in Maricopa County uncertifiable.
    An estimated 173,104 votes are missing or lost, as reported to our volunteers who went door to door verifying registration and voting information for thousands of residents. These are American citizens living in Maricopa County who cast a vote, primarily by mail, in the election and yet there is no record of their vote with the county and it was not counted in the reported vote totals for the election. Additionally an estimated 96,389 mail-in votes were cast under the names of registered voters who were either unknown to the residents of the registration address or who were verified as having moved away prior to October 2020. Other irregularities were uncovered during the canvass at a smaller scale, including votes cast by mail from vacant lots, votes recorded from residents who had not actually voted, etc.
    These results are a travesty to our democracy and our voting rights. In addition to impacted local races, such as Maricopa County Board of Supervisors District 1, decided by 403 votes, key statewide race margins are well within the numbers shown above. The Presidential race was decided by 10,457 votes statewide, and the U.S. Senate election was decided by 78,886 votes statewide.

  3. John Robert Stevens

    Mr. Stringer is of course correct Trump lost because he didn’t get enough votes, as others have noted. But maybe not the voters David writes about. Trump lost because too many voters were repelled by Mr. Trumps narcissism, and general overall boorishness. For all the many excellent results of his policies, many voters want a President who is a good man. A man with those standard American virtues we all admire. Simply stated, Mr. Trump is a flawed candidate.
    That enabled the other team to put forward and prop up what turned out to be a worse, even dangerous, choice. But that poor enfeebled old man looked to many like a “return to normalcy.”
    Sure, better leadership of the Republican Party is needed. But mostly we need better candidates.

    1. I just think you and Mr. Stringer should consider becoming Democrats. They too hate Trump and blame him for everything. You will both feel right at home. The party is for Constitutional conservatives. No room for milk-toast RINOs anymore.

      1. Ryan: Please know I voted for Trump, and would again given the same choice. My comments were intended get at Mr Stringer’s point of Who didn’t vote for Trump? My answer is Those voters turned off by Trumps behavior while unable to see, understand and appreciate the many good things he accomplished. I don’t “hate Trump”. I want Republicans to win elections.

        1. You’re analysis of “why Trump lost” is contrived and based on your own personal views which are not based in fact. It’s like explaining how the world is flat because of what is visible to the naked eye. Why do you dismiss the fact that the elections database was destroyed? Are you ok with that? Or are you just wanting to conform with the herd? The Audit showed that raw ballot counts matched but you and David should read beyond the first paragraph of the report. If you’d read further you’d find that a huge number of the counted ballots had massive irregularities (counterfeit?) that question the validity. This shouldn’t be about Trump. This should be about confidence in a free and fair election. Ignoring the issues doesn’t make the problem go away. You really should invest some time researching the numerous state audits.

  4. What amazes me is how, to the fraud deniers, evidence can be willfully destroyed and since there is now a lack of evidence, we are to assume that the destroyed evidence wouldn’t have proven anything. Where are the arrests? Where are the interrogations to find who ordered it? Brno has one job.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top