Opinion: The Ancients Knew How to Educate Children; Why Don’t Today’s ‘Educators’? – Inside Sources

It’s understandable that many parents are upset about what is being taught in their schools. They should be even more upset about what’s not being taught (at least not effectively): English grammar, reading, writing, mathematics, logic, truth, goodness, aesthetics.

Some are clamoring for the federal government to get more involved and establish national curriculum standards. But the government has been deeply involved in K-12 education since 1980, when the Department of Education was established; and education hasn’t noticeably improved.

As proof, last year’s National Assessment of Educational Progress exams, which tested tens of thousands of students nationwide, confirmed that only about a third of fourth- and eighth-graders qualified as “proficient” in readingmathcivics and American history. In urban districts, 47 percent of fourth-graders couldn’t even read at a basic level.

Much of the controversy over what’s being taught revolves around the treatment of race and gender issues in classrooms, textbooks and school libraries. These are legitimate concerns, but focusing solely on book content is a distraction when so many children can’t read the books to begin with.

Since Horace Mann in the 1850s, education has been a government responsibility; but curriculum decisions should be made by elected school boards, based on the values of the local community and a school’s focus — with some schools emphasizing STEM subjects (science, technology, engineering, math), others emphasizing the arts, and so forth. Such a variety in many respects would mimic the existing world of charter schools and would allow parents to choose the type of school they prefer.

At the elementary school level — grades kindergarten through five or six — there is no better model for student success than direct instruction and the classical “trivium,” which, as Albert Chung, the director of the Classical Education Research Lab at the University of Arkansas has noted, goes back “to between the 5th century B.C. and the 5th century A.D. during the Greek and Roman classical periods.”

Classical thought, however, “is not limited to these two civilizations,” he points out. “Many other cultures … throughout Africa, East Asia and the Islamic Empire” also had classical periods.

The trivium — Latin for “three ways” — identifies a sequence of three phases necessary for learning a subject, any subject. It’s the way students were taught throughout the Western world from the time of the ancient classical scholars until the early 20th century when John Dewey and other “progressive reformers” rejected it.

The first phase, during the early grades, involves the basic facts and vocabulary of a subject. This is known as the “grammar” phase. A major goal during this phase is for students to learn as many words and concepts as possible. These are the building blocks for all future learning: names of objects, people and places; the rules of math, phonics, spelling and sentence structure; the stories of history, literature and myth; descriptions of plants and animals; and the roots of our language, especially Latin.

Second is the “logic” phase, where students learn to apply and enhance the information, rules and vocabulary they’ve learned. During this time, students become less focused on rote facts, start thinking more analytically and logically, and begin to question the “why” behind the order of things.

Finally, there’s the “rhetoric” phase, in which students learn the art and discipline of persuasion and develop the skills to communicate effectively, preparing themselves to become lifelong independent learners.

Any topic can be taught in this sequenced way. While it may be out of fashion, this step-by-step phased succession of learning is no less effective today than it was 2,500 years ago.

Families don’t need the dysfunctional federal government telling them what and how their children should learn. They know what their children need to learn — and we and others know how to teach them, just as the ancients knew: first you help them accumulate knowledge (grammar); then you help them understand the why and how of the facts they’ve learned (logic), then you give them the skills to explain it to others (rhetoric).

At the end of this process, you’ll have well-rounded young adults ready for life’s challenges, for being parents, and, as Aristotle said, for making civilization “flourish.”


1 thought on “Opinion: The Ancients Knew How to Educate Children; Why Don’t Today’s ‘Educators’? – Inside Sources”

  1. This article starts out bad with the title, and doesn’t improve. If Mr. Mitchell’s article is an accurate indicator of the effectiveness of our education system, then yeah, we need to make some changes. Humans and the associated society have evolved significantly since the days of the ancients. Actually, there have been mucho changes even during my life time of 88 years. As a 10 year old, I carried, in two buckets, up a hill, all of the water our family of 6 used, including washing clothes, including diapers, and baths. At that time, we didn’t have a phone, and that was before TV and computers. I did attend school and I won the 4th grade geography bee contest, but not the spelling bee, and as a HS senior, the class valedictorian. Looking back, I don’t think my public school education would stack up very well with today’s standards. But has it had a negative effect on my quality of life for the past 82 years? No. Well, a minor exception: my buddy and I did get a boarding from Wild Bill Eldridge the last day of our HS senior year. One lick for everyday we were late to study hall.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top