How long does a tree or ecosystem remember a drought? – Northern Arizona University

Photo: Sunset at Baptiste Lookout, Flathead National Forest, Montana. Courtesy photo by Hufstetler/U.S. Forest Service

Ecosystems have a long memory. That may not be a good thing.

What scientists have learned is that extreme climate events like drought and heat waves don’t just negatively impact plants, trees and other vegetation while they’re ongoing. The effects of climate extremes, especially droughts, leave a legacy of trauma in the affected vegetation. That legacy lingers, continuing to affect ecosystems long after they have occurred.

Scientists don’t yet know what that means, but they know it’s likely bad. A new research project led by NAU ecological data scientist Kiona Ogle aims to examine the effects that an ecosystem’s “memory” has on its current and future productivity and provide improved forecasts of drought impacts on ecosystems and vegetation, as well as their associated carbon cycles.

“The importance of such legacies and memory is not well understood but is likely critical to understanding how continued climate change will impact Earth’s ecosystems and carbon balance,” Ogle said. “This study will help us understand how such events impact our precious ecosystems and vegetation, the degree to which they are impacted and the legacies of those impacts.”

So, how long does an extreme event, such as drought, continue to influence ecosystem functioning and vegetation productivity? Here’s how the team is answering that question.

The research, which looks at climate legacies on the carbon cycle processes in drylands throughout the American West, is a collaboration between NAU and UCLA and is funded by a $4.5 million grant from the National Science Foundation, with $3.6 million going to NAU. Researchers will collect and analyze data from an array of sources, including tree-rings, satellite imagery and eddy flux towers, as well as use computer modeling to predict future ecosystem behavior.

The team is going to piece together how the legacies and memory of climate variables like precipitation, drought and temperature affect tree growth, forest productivity and ecosystem carbon fluxes in the western United States. Ogle, a professor in the School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems (SICCS) is the lead principal investigator. The NAU co-PIs are:

  • Jay Barber, an associate professor in SICCS, who will contribute to statistical modeling of different data sets that hold clues to the impacts of extreme events on tree and ecosystem productivity.
  • Deborah Huntzinger, a professor in the School of Earth and Sustainability, who will lead efforts that use predictions from global ecosystem models to evaluate if the models are able to capture the legacy effects of extreme climate events.
  • Kimberly Samuels-Crow, an assistant research professor in SICCS, who will lead the work to identify extreme climate events from various long-term climate data sets and will lead outreach activities to help inform the public about the impacts of drought via professional river guide networks.
  • Drew Peltier, a postdoctoral scholar in the Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, who will lead efforts to analyze tree-ring data from throughout the western United States and will collect new tree-ring data from NSF ecological research networks.

The UCLA collaborators—Nicholas Parazoo, who also is affiliated with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and Rong Fu—will focus on the integration of satellite data to better understand ecosystem productivity responses on a larger scale and the integration of multiple data sources with large-scale ecosystem models, which will improve scientists’ ability to capture and predict the legacy effects of extreme climate events.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest

1 thought on “How long does a tree or ecosystem remember a drought? – Northern Arizona University”

  1. I fear the multi decade global warming from the UN brought us to a skeptical view of facts known. CO2 levels have varied since the earth began cooling and we know CO2 was 5-10 times higher than today through ice core samples gas bubbles from thousands of years ago. Fraud in past studies computer models taints future studies and are tied to creating future funding of programs. Studies of the sun and solar storm cycles (sun spots) seem to be a large part that corelates to changes in our weather patterns over time . What I have observer is the UN studies were directed to prove man caused CO2 increases is the danger on the future of our climate temperatures. CO2 levels at 1/40th of ONE percent of our atmosphere is not a problem but a benefit to plant growth and oxygen production.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Scroll to Top